Survey will open in a new window or redirect momentarily, please keep this tab open! If the survey does not open, please enable popups and refresh the page.

Status:

Dismiss

DO DIFFERENT EFFECT SIZES IN META-ANALYSES LEAD TO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS?

Study ID sspp-2025-0023-v1

General Details

Project DO DIFFERENT EFFECT SIZES IN META-ANALYSES LEAD TO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS?
Study ID sspp-2025-0023-v1
Study Title DO DIFFERENT EFFECT SIZES IN META-ANALYSES LEAD TO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS?
Authors April Wang, Tom Coupe, Sanghyun Hong, Shinichi Nakagawa, Bob Reed, Yefeng Yang
Completion Time 5 Minutes
Close Date (UTC) June 30, 2025
Discipline Economics
Field Applied Econometrics, Econometrics, Experimental Economics
Country Online (many countries)
Abstract
This survey seeks your views on whether meta-analyses are likely to produce different conclusions when using alternative effect sizes.


Forecast Distributions


When uploading forecasting surveys, authors are asked to select several key questions which are often the questions they think are the most important to the study.

View Key Question Response Distribution:
Disclaimer: All data are preliminary and may differ from the published results.



Citation
Wang, April, Coupe, Tom, Hong, Sanghyun, Nakagawa, Shinichi, Reed, Bob, and Yefeng Yang. 2025. "DO DIFFERENT EFFECT SIZES IN META-ANALYSES LEAD TO DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS?." Social Science Prediction Platform. May 3. https://socialscienceprediction.org/s/6008cc

Download Qualtrics File